While reading Freedman, No turning back, the History of feminism and the future of Women. The author quotes Rousseau as to a women’s place, “Woman is framed particularly for the delight and pleasure of man”. (Freedman, 48). And while Rousseau is an 18th century Romanticism philosopher this ideology of women still has merit today. When you look at sexual harassment through this lens, it is easily understood how we are all forced to “do” gender.
Sexual Harassment is a form of social control to control a men or women into acting properly by societal norms for both gender and race. If women are framed for men as Rousseau attests then it stands to reason, that any dynamic or behavior that contradicts this ideology threatens society.
Salaam, addresses this behavior in another way in her book, “The verbal and physical violations in the Dominican Republic and the United States hinged on men’s relationship to women as objects for gratification”(Hernandez and Rehman, 335). In order to receive gratification men must make women feel powerless. In taking power from women men redeem themselves and women become objects for the delight or pleasure of men.
But what has always struck me as strange is that we all seem to look for men’s pleasure and their gratification we must always seem to forget our own and how our lives don’t necessarily need to be an extension of men.
In studying sexual harassment this week, I understand how sexual harassment is in fact a form of social control as described in the text the biggest example of sexual harassment and social control of women and race for me are the Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill hearings. This is the beginning of defining sexual harassment in the workplace for women.